Peer Review Process

The Editor-in-Chief and Associate Editors assess the initial suitability of articles submitted. Submissions considered to be suitable for the EJAS will be sent out to at least two reviewers who will referee the article. Unsuitable articles are returned to the authors with a short note of explanation from the Editor-in-Chief. The refereeing process is “double-blind”: the identity of the author remains anonymous to the referee and vice versa. Authors may be asked to re-submit their article in revised form, though in all but exceptional circumstances, the Editor will consider only one re-submission. Upon completion of the refereeing and editorial processes, authors and referees will be notified of the Editor's decision about publication with explanatory feedback, including referees’ reports.